

On one hand, there are little narrative moves in both acts that successfully segment them into somewhat discrete works. Taken as one work, though, Broken Age still feels conflicted about its two-act structure, and the fact that its division was primarily a business decision tends to show despite Double Fine’s best efforts. On some level, almost every single one of my friends reminds me of at least one of Day of the Tentacle’s three main characters.Ĭonsidering it’s literally split across two games, it’s a given that Broken Age lacks a certain amount of this internal cohesion. The way the worlds of games like this can ring true trumps the fact that, as systems, they come off like total whiny babies.
Broken age art style full#
Ben and his Polecats opted for Full Throttle’s electric bunnies and fake IDs instead of methamphetamine and unlicensed firearms, thank God.īy the same token, the worlds and narratives in these games are weird, detailed and internally cohesive enough that their “reality” transcends both the perennial shoddiness of their protagonists’ fake mustaches and their utter unwillingness to talk to anyone about their increasingly absurd problems. Would walking Gabriel Knight to a costume shop to buy a fake mustache have made for a better game? Guybrush Threepwood, with his self-awareness and tendency towards nonviolence, would have made a terrible pirate. Suspension of disbelief-being willing to submit oneself whole hog to adventure games’ hairbrained versions of reality-is what makes them so fun. There’s no objective level of insanity that the puzzles occasionally cross the extent to which a puzzle is bad is just a function of how much it takes the player out of being absorbed in the rest of the game. I’ve never quite understood gripes about the hilariously implausible solutions adventure games dictate for their puzzles. The game (and by extension, I guess, the game’s designer) is afforded that aforementioned tangy euphoria. (One of the most diabolical puzzles in Act Two consists of untying a really complicated knot.) The player is given the satisfaction of basically reading the game’s mind, and of having solved a very specific, tangible problem. They present impossibly convoluted situations and give the player the opportunity and raw materials to sort things out. Point-and-click adventures like Broken Age know exactly what they want. If things go your way, however, you’re allowed the tangy euphoria of getting exactly what you want, on your terms. As long as you don’t mind being despondent or embarrassed while your concerns are not properly addressed, you get to blame the universe if things don’t work out. In a way, then, the crying character had the right idea manufacturing problems with ridiculous, arcane solutions can be a win-win. All involved parties have a great time as a result. Eventually, the flimsiest possible facsimile of the character’s solution slips by it and its friends undetected. “Please think about these solutions before you present them!” the character exhorts, in between sobs of despair. While the game’s protagonist does her best to propose various stopgaps, up to and including reminding the characters that they’re in a prison of their own design, nothing will do. The problem-as the character sees it, anyway-has an extremely specific solution, and when that solution becomes unavailable the character and its friends wind up inconsolable. There’s a scene in Broken Age: Act 2 involving a character who has based its entire existence around having created a problem for itself.
